Showing posts with label Review. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Review. Show all posts

Friday, February 6, 2015

Chris Hemsworth is truly one of the most bankable stars, and definitely in-demand. His projects have surfaced here and there. Aside from his current film, Blackhat, the Aussie actor will also be in the much-anticipated sequel of The Avengers, The Avengers: Age of Ultron, where he will once again put on his armor as the God of Thunder, Thor.
Thor had been Hemsworth ultimate ride to instant fame. He has shown that he had more than just the looks and the charms, he's also got the acting skills to pull of his action-packed scenes and transformations in Marvel's stand-alone films. The 31-year old actor, crowned last year as People's Sexiest Man Alive, had managed to win over many fans because of that.
It's no wonder why the cries are louder than before for Thor 3: Ragnarok. Here's the latest Thor 3: Ragnarok Release Date and Plot Spoilers.
It will still be awhile until we see Thor back in the Kingdom of Asgard fighting his own battles, and Hemsworth is mum about the details of his film. However, he did give some hints as to what stage in the production they're currently at.
"There is no script for Thor, the next Thor, so I have no idea where he'll up. But it's a pretty, big one."
He also hinted that fans better stay tune and better not miss out on the Age of Ultron because there will be big events that will occur there that will have an effect on nearly all Avenger standalone movies, including the third Thor 3.
"Yeah, definitely. I mean, it has to, doesn't it? Unless I was on the sidelines kind of waving. He's not."
Possible spoiler alert. Rumors have been spreading that, with the introduction of Scarlet Witch in The Avengers: Age of Ultron will give Marvel fans a brief glimpse into the future, one which might involve the sexy God dead. But, it might not just be him.
A Reddit User, LuneyTunes, pointed out that this hint was actually in the trailer. "There is a shot in the previous 'Age of Ultron' trailer that shows Captain America's shield broken. If you look closely, you will see Thor's arm also. I think this is the future shown by Scarlet Witch - and is his and Steve Roger's death in a faceoff with Thanos."
This, of course, hasn't been confirmed nor denied by the people behind Thor 3. Although Ragnarok does signify the end of the Thor standalone film, it still remains inconclusive.
Back in July 2014, Kevin Feige, Marvel's president revealed that the storyline for the third movie was still being outlined. And a lot of changes could be made since we're too far from the release date.
Thor 3: Ragnarok arrives in theatres on June 28, 2017.

Thor 3: Ragnarok Release Date and Plot Spoilers: Chris Hemsworth Shares Update on Script, Hints of Effect of 'Avengers: Age of Ultron' in Events of 'Thor 3'.

The Avengers Age of Ultron Plot Details The Avengers: Age of Ultron Plot Details Revealed [Spoilers]
In a year with Star Wars: The Force Awakens, Jurassic World, Mad Max: Fury Road, and more, The Avengers: Age of Ultron has competition for most anticipated movie of the year – but it’s undoubtedly the most anticipated superhero movie of the year (sorry, Ant-Man and Fantastic Four). The followup to Joss Whedon’s insanely popular The Avengers will see the titular team battling Ultron, a psychotic robot with the voice of James Spader (The Blacklist).
[SPOILERS BEYOND THIS POINT]
The Beginning of ‘Age of Ultron’ & New Relationships
Avengers 2 Age of Ultron Lifting Thors Hammer The Avengers: Age of Ultron Plot Details Revealed [Spoilers]
Avengers producer Jeremy Latcham talked about the team’s status at the beginning of the film, saying:
'This movie starts off and the team is together, on a mission, they’re working in tandem, and there are new relationships between them. Time has passed, so you pick up right in the middle of an action sequence and start trying to catch up.”
The action sequence likely involves the defeat of Baron von Strucker, which will apparently lead to the Avengers party from the trailers that depicts various Avengers attempting to pick up Thor’s hammer. This is the point of the story when everything seems to be going well for the team – they’re working well together, they’re happy, they’re successful. Obviously, this won’t last for long once Ultron does his thing.
The Hulk and Black Widow in Avengers Age of Ultron The Avengers: Age of Ultron Plot Details Revealed [Spoilers]
Latcham continued:
“I think [it's] fun for an audience to try and figure out, ‘Wait, those two are funny together now, there’s something going on with them, maybe there’s a little tension over there.’ You’re showing up at a party when it’s already a little bit started.”
It seems that the two characters with “tension” are likely Bruce Banner and Black Widow. There have been hints in the trailers that they have something of a connection, but it’s yet unclear if that connection is romantic in nature.
Said Joss Whedon about them:
“They’re an unlikely pair, but there’s something about the two of them that neither can deny.”
Sounds kind of romantic to us.
-
Joss Whedon’s Favorite Character Is Black Widow

Black Widow Johansson The Avengers: Age of Ultron Plot Details Revealed [Spoilers]
It’s probably no surprise that Scarlett Johansson’s Black Widow is Joss Whedon’s favorite character. From Buffy the Vampire Slayer to Firefly to Dollhouse to his work on Astonishing X-Men, Whedon tends to to be particularly fond of the female characters in his stories.
Said Whedon:
“[Black Widow] has a special place in my heart – there is one scene in each movie that was filmed pretty much unchanged from the first draft, and they’re both Natasha scenes. She’s just somebody that I feel like I get.”
Before Whedon wrote Black Widow in The Avengers, she was a pretty one-dimensional, uninteresting character in Iron Man 2. Most would agree that it was Whedon’s depiction of Widow that made her the popular character she is today, with fans all over clamoring for a standalone film.
-

How ‘Age of Ultron’ Will Lead to ‘Captain America: Civil War’

The Avengers Age of Ultron Iron Man Captain America Robert Downey Jr Chris Evans The Avengers: Age of Ultron Plot Details Revealed [Spoilers]

In the wake of Captain America: The Winter Soldier – and the dissolution of SHIELD – the Avengers are basically leaderless. While this is seemingly not a problem at the beginning of Age of Ultron, it’ll definitely become one during the film’s running time.
Jeremy Letchum said:
“SHIELD has fallen apart, so this movie becomes Tony Stark and Steve Rogers trying to put the Avengers together without a parental unit like Nick Fury hovering over them. What you realize is that these are guys who work best with rules, and probably do need some adult supervision.”
Both Tony Stark and Steve Rogers are stubborn, strong-willed individuals, and otherwise very different personality-wise. Needless to say, that sort of combination can lead to some conflict, and it might very well be (part of) the impetus for Captain America: Civil War.
Said Letchum:
“Tony has been paying for everything, designing stuff, building new toys, he’s the benefactor of the whole thing. But Steve Rogers is very much in charge of operations and missions, he’s the moral compass. But how long can Tony Stark have someone else be in charge?”
Probably not very long. It’ll be interesting to see what else will come to cause the Civil War besides personality differences. (After all, that’d be a pretty petty war.) Since the Marvel Cinematic Universe doesn’t hinge upon secret identities like the comic books do – and the Civil War of the comic books did – what will be at the heart of the film’s conflict?
-

‘Avengers: Age of Ultron’ Is a Mish-Mash of Genres

Avengers Age of Ultron battle The Avengers: Age of Ultron Plot Details Revealed [Spoilers]
The Marvel movies are known for having similar structures, styles, tones, and general “feels,” though they do occasionally fit into pre-established genres in addition to the amorphous “superhero genre.” The First Avengers was sort of a war movie, Winter Soldier was sort of a ’70s spy thriller, Guardians of the Galaxy was sort of a space opera, and so on.
But what, pray tell, is The Avengers: Age of Ultron? According to Whedon, it’s kind of a whole bunch of genres mixed together:
“With the first [Avengers], I set out to make a war movie. This time I said to Marvel, ‘I really want to make more of a science-fiction horror.’ But then in the first week I was like ‘This is clearly a western.’ “Then it became a war movie again, then, ‘Oh no, it’s a romantic comedy, a 1940s romantic comedy… No, it’s Ibsen! No, okay, it’s definitely an adventure. It’s an action comedy!’
“I suppose if it’s gonna get put in a category, it has got some science fiction in it, but for me, it’s just everything. And hopefully that doesn’t come out as ADD, but as what happens when you put these different people together, you get that kind of weird dissonance with their different worlds and styles, and you hopefully make music out of it, instead of a horrible cacophony.”
Considering Whedon has plenty of experience mixing and matching genres – every single project he’s ever worked on has done this – we can’t imagine Avengers 2 will make “a horrible cacophony” out of it.

The Reason Scarlet Witch and Quicksilver Fight The Avengers

Quicksilver and Scarlet Witch in The Avengers Age of Ultron The Avengers: Age of Ultron Plot Details Revealed [Spoilers]
Elizabeth Olsen – who plays Scarlet Witch in Age of Ultron – explained why she and her brother Quicksilver join an evil talking robot to take on The Avengers.
Said Olsen:
“Our characters have a lot of anger, especially towards Tony Stark, and we want revenge. We meet Ultron, and he’s someone who preaches peace and… believes what we believe, which is that the Avengers create destruction and that Tony Stark’s bomb is responsible for killing our parents.”
Tony Stark’s bomb? Is this a bomb he created in his past life as a weapons manufacturer (as portrayed in the original Iron Man movie)?
-

The Difference Between Hawkeye in ‘The Avengers’ and ‘Age of Ultron’

avengers age ultron opening scene hawkeye The Avengers: Age of Ultron Plot Details Revealed [Spoilers]


Jeremy Renner sort of famously didn’t love his work on The Avengers, mostly because he was relegated to being hypnotized by Loki for more than half the film. We’ve known for a while now that that would change for the sequel, and Joss Whedon backs that up here.
Said Whedon:
“We got to do some interesting stuff with Hawkeye which is a different kind of dark. It’s been fun for Jeremy because he was possessed for so long last time – it’s interesting to not be a zombie!”
Not only will Hawkeye “not be a zombie” in the film, but he’ll also get some really nifty sleeves to keep him warm. So it’s good news all around for Jeremy Renner.

Joss Whedon Is Done Making ‘Avengers’ Movies

Joss Whedon and Chris Hemsworth on The Avengers set The Avengers: Age of Ultron Plot Details Revealed [Spoilers]

For the umpteenth time now, Joss Whedon is making it clear that he has no intention of returning to make more Avengers films. Not for Avengers: Infinity War Part 1 or 2, not for a hypothetical Avengers/Guardians of the Galaxy crossover, not for anything.
Said Whedon on the subject:
“I cannot imagine directing a film with – if you’ll pardon the expression – more f**king people in it. I’d love to see one, though.”
Don’t be too sad, Whedon fans, this is potentially very good news. After Whedon takes a much deserved break from directing massive blockbuster movies, he’ll be able to use his Avengers clout to create something brand-new on a much larger scale than his previous projects. That’s something we should all be excited for.
To see the Digital Spy’s full list of 25 things they learned on the set of The Avengers 2, GO HERE.

‘The Avengers: Age of Ultron’ Plot Details Revealed [Spoilers]

justice league
Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice sequel - The Justice League script is reportedly not too commercially viable.
People who have read the script for Justice League think it may be too complex for the average viewer to follow. Last week, Tech Times reported that the script for the DC superhero team-up movie has already been turned in, but not without some issues. (via Enstars)
As per the website's report, there are claims that the script is "too long and complicated" for the "average moviegoer" to understand.
Apparently, people who have read the script believe it's too long, complicated and only comic book fans will be able to follow it - which makes the film targeted to only a niche audience. It might not be the best move in terms of business for the studio considering the fact that DC superhero films are essentially serious and dark, as it is.
The report also revealed who the villain of the movie will be - it's Vril Dox, the original identity of Braniac in The New 52 comics (DC Comics' relaunch).
"It makes sense for Brainiac to show up because rumor claims the movie, currently, is codenamed Justice League: Brainiac's Saga, and it will be the first time we get to see Brainiac on the big screen," states Tech Times.
However, no official announcement has been made yet regarding the main villain in the movie.
Justice League Part 1 is slated to be released on 17 November, 2017 and Justice League Part 2, on 14 June, 2019.

The Justice League movie: Script ready but too complicated; Film's main villain revealed?

Tom Cruise is back in Mission: Impossible 5
The first "Mission: Impossible 5" teaser trailer may possibly premiere next week!
Yes, the first look at the "MI" sequel possibly subtitled "Taurus" with Tom Cruise may debut as early as Friday, Feb. 13. It looks like the clip will tie in as a preview for "Kingsman: The Secret Service," according to the fairly accurate website, The Projection List.
And not only do we have an anticipated trailer release date, but news recently broke that the Christopher McQuarrie-directed project will come out this summer instead of around Christmas. How great is that?
With McQuarrie as director, some fans think "Mission: Impossible 5" will have a neo-western influence. This assumption could be valid with focusing on Katie Holmes' ex as the title character. But could there be a lot of interesting subplots and a possible romance for our lead action star?
We hope so!
Ethan Hunt has become an unyielding character, giving momentum to the "Mission: Impossible" franchise despite it being plagued with several gestating sequels. The first film was criticized for favoring style instead of substance in 1996, but the chase sequences and talked-about visuals throughout the four films have stuck in fans' minds.
But accusations about Cruise developing an "unfavorable" relationship with his 22-year-old assistant on the "MI: 5" set have also struck a chord with some moviegoers.
Paramount Pictures hasn't released an official plot yet, but fans cannot wait. Can you believe that it has been nearly 20 years since the first film in the franchise?
The movie also stars Jeremy Renner, Rebecca Ferguson, Ving Rhames, Simon Pegg and Alec Baldwin; the screenplay was penned by Drew Pearce. We hope this sequel is better than ll,lll, and "Ghost Protocol!"
"Mission: Impossible 5" will hit theaters nationwide on July 31.
Are you excited about this film directed by J.J. Abrams?
Please let us know with a note or two below!

Mission: Impossible 5 Trailer Release Date REVEALED?

(Photo : STARZ/Outlander's Official Facebook Page) "Outlander" stars Sam Heughan and Caitriona Balfe both land new movie roles while STARZ will release volume one of the "Outlander" soundtrack on February 10, 2015.
STARZ recently announced that they will release the "Outlander" soundtrack on February 10, 2015 while both Sam Heughan and Caitriona Balfe have nabbed two new movie roles as well.
According to Soundtrack.net, STARZ will release the "Outlander Origial Television Soundtrack, Volume One" on Tuesday, February 10 2015 in both digital and DC formats.
The album will feature original music composed by Bear McCreary, who previously won an Emmy Award for his work and will include period-accurate songs that were adapted by the composer himself in order to fit the show's storyline.
STARZ also announced on Facebook that the cast of "Outlander" will be appearing at PaleyFest LA on March 12 and if fans want to purchase tickets to the event, they may do by visiting the official site. Tickets generally range from $30 to $80 for the general public and from $20 to $65 for Paley Members.
Aside from the PaleyFest announcement, fans also have further reasons to rejoice, as both Caitriona Balfe and Sam Heughan have landed new movie roles.
The Hollywood Reporter writes that Balfe will join Jack O'Connell, Julia Roberts, and George Clooney in the financial thriller "Money Cast."
Clooney will play a man named Lee Gates, who has been described as a "television stock huckster" whose life and show are turned upside down when an aging gunman, played by O'Connell, takes him hostage.
While the rest of the world watches in horror, Gates has to stay alive with the help of his producer, played by Roberts and attempt to get to the bottom of the "big-money lies."
Balfe has been cast as the head of a PR company whose stock failed miserably, which caused O'Connell's character's life savings to be entirely wiped out.
Meanwhile, Sam Heughan has been cast in the indie flick "When The Starlight Ends" opposite Arabella Oz, adds The Wrap.
The handsome Scottish actor will play a struggling writer who fell into a deep depression after losing the love of his life. After confronting the decisions he made that drove his girlfriend away, Heughan's character decides to pen a story where he basically rewrites his life the way he wished it would've gone.
"Outlander" fans, will you see Heughan and Balfe's new movies? Why or why not? Let us know your thoughts by leaving a comment!

‘Outlander’ NEWS: Sam Heughan Cast In New Indie Movie, STARZ To Release Soundtrack On February 10 [SEE DETAILS]

Thursday, February 5, 2015


Starring Keanu Reeves, Michael Nyqvist, Alfie Allen, Adrianne Palicki, Bridget Moynahan, Dean Winters, Ian McShane, John Leguizamo, Willem Dafoe. Directed by Chad Stahelski. (2014, 101 min). Lionsgate

In terms of pure audience manipulation, John Wick might just be the greatest tale of revenge ever made. The best ones (from the artistic to the exploitative) all have one thing in common: they make vengeance a totally justifiable course of action. Who didn’t cheer-on Charles Bronson’s mugger-murdering rampage in Death Wish, Clint Eastwood’s cold, calculated retribution in High Plains Drifter or Uma Thurman’s bloody wrath in Kill Bill?

Violent payback seldom works out how we’d like it to in the real world, but it’s damn fun to watch, which is obviously why tales of revenge - both calculated and reactionary - have been mainstays of popular entertainment ever since Shakespeare scribbled Hamlet.

But John Wick may trump them all. Not because of its kinetic action scenes (which are truly exciting), not because of Keanu Reeves as the title character (even though he hasn't been this badass since The Matrix), and certainly not because of the complexity of the story (this might be the most simple tale of revenge since the original Mad Max). John Wick manages to get the audience totally onboard because director Chad Stahelski and screenwriter Derek Kolstad know what will truly rouse us into a state of bloodthirsty vengeance…

...killing this girl:

"Oh no! Not the dog!"

You gotta be one steel-hearted bastard not to be moved by the passing of a pooch, often the canine equivalent of Spock’s demise at the end of Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan.

In John Wick, the title character (Keanu Reeves) is a legendary hitman who retires from the business to take care of his cancer-stricken wife. Her last act before dying was sending John a gift, a puppy named Daisy, so he wouldn’t have to grieve alone. John forms an immediate attachment to Daisy and takes her everywhere. Then a couple of Russian thugs, ignorant of who he is and simply want his classic ‘69 Mustang, break into his house, beat him up and kill Daisy. That’s all it takes for Wick to unleash the fury and hunt them down. Complicating matters is the fact one of those thugs is the son of Viggo Tarsov (Michael Nyqvist), who once hired Wick to kill everyone who stood in the way of his quest to be the most powerful leader of the Russian mob.

But really, John Wick grabbed us at Daisy’s death, because…

...well, just look at her!

Sure, Wick’s revenge is based more by what Daisy represents (his wife’s dying symbol of love) than Daisy herself, but the fact she’s just a puppy (the cutest movie puppy ever) makes his systematic slaughter all the more righteous. Would we feel the same way if his dying wife sent him a cat? I doubt it, because unless they’re hungry, cats generally don’t give a shit about us.

But there’s something about the untimely screen death of a pooch which, no matter how many people have been shot, stabbed, blown-up, crushed, devoured or disemboweled, has most of us crying, “Oh no! Not the dog!” Which is why John Wick, despite its simplistic story, is such a satisfying tale of revenge. Shamelessly manipulative? Absolutely, but supremely effective nonetheless.

This was one of the best action movies of 2014, and certainly worth seeing more than once.


JOHN WICK: The Best Action Film of 2014 (Review)


Trailer


By transporting the narrative from a common day modern setting to a universe where anything is possible and new foundations for proper societal living are fundamentally obscured and changed, science fiction allows the audience to question their own ambiguous handling of impossible scenarios safely without ever having to worry about being in the same unfathomable predicament. Dean Israelite'sProject Almanac (2014) scrapes the surface of contemplating how much is personal gain worth when the reaction of one decision is detrimentally consequential for the greater good, but loses its overall point more than once with unneeded extended party scenes.


There's a divide between wanting to be a mature and well thought out sci-fi movie and wanting to appeal to the broadest audience base possible within MTV's demographic. In Project Almanac, resident boy genius David Raskin (Jonny Weston) and his two best friends Quinn Goldberg (Sam Lerner) and Adam Le (Adam Evangelista) stumble upon directions to build a time machine left by David's dead father ten years ago. The trio, whom are quite frankly far too intelligent and curious to be left without any kind of parental supervision, manage to collect all the pieces of apparatus to actually build the machine all while David's younger sister Christina (Virginia Gardner) films their entire process. Once it's built, the four decide to finally test their theoretical device.

After a terrible mishap, the gang are forced to initiate high school bombshell and David's current crush Jessie Pierce (Sofia Black D'Elia) into their group. At first the five have the time of their lives, using the time machine to resolve personal problems and further their own achievements, but when they start to realise their direct actions have cataclysmic reactions, it all goes awry. Project Almanac uses just enough science and technology to make the more mundane moments including the unbelievably boring romantic arc between David and Jessie bearable, but the best part of the movie is the interesting use of camerawork. The handheld quasi documentary style fluctuates between speeding up events to create an overwhelming feeling of claustrophobic chaos and rapidly slowed moments to allow the audience to focus on what's happening during the team's jump in time.

The handiwork of the camerawork gets muddled down with cheesy neon coloured glitches whenever something goes wrong, but overall it's pretty impressive how they were able to blend the natural feel of a documentary with obvious cinematic effects. Project Almanac's exuberance for the scientific aspect of time travel, unique use of handheld camerawork, and allusion to allegorical decisions makes for a fun watch, even if the overwhelming teen feel to the film detracts from being taken too seriously. With references to other sci-fi films, however, it's obvious Project Almanac is aware of its genre clichés, strengths, and faults, and that makes for a 
genuinely fun time for film buffs.

Project Almanac : Movie Review

American Sniper header
Director Clint Eastwood has great aspirations for American Sniper. First and foremost, he hopes to make a movie paying tribute to the most deadly sniper in the history of the United States. That’s the late Chris Kyle, played by Bradley Cooper. He also hopes to show Kyle not as only a heroic solider, but a complex man confident in his actions and concerned about of their results. The film paints a grim picture of post-traumatic stress disorder and what it does to our veterans, especially in regards to their families. Finally, there’s also a drive to keep things exciting, so there are many gun battles in the deserts of Iraq.
Yes, American Sniper is an incredibly ambitious film with many moving parts. All of those parts work in certain instances, but only on rare occasions do they all come together at once. The disconnection makes the film fall just short of those great aspirations.
American Sniper had its World Premiere on Veterans Day at AFI Fest presented by Audi and you can read the rest of our review below.
American Sniper trailer

The Trailer Tells the Story

Much of what works and doesn’t about American Sniper is in the very first scene. It’s the trailer scene. That tense moment where Chris Kyle (Cooper) has to decide, on his own, whether or not a woman and child need to die. The tension is palpable and just at the moment of truth, the film cuts. For the next 45 minutes we see Chris Kyle as a boy, then a man. Eventually we meet Chris Kyle, the solider. Cooper has a steadfast likeablity in these scenes and it’s a good set up to get us ready for everything that follows. Still, it’s a long detour to eventually get back to that great scene.
american-sniper-1

A Legend Is Born and Family Is Everything

Once the film gets back to that opening, it moves on with Kyle’s time as a Navy SEAL sniper. Very quickly, he develops a reputation as “The Legend,” a man wanted by the enemy and adored by all soldiers. Despite all the violence and carnage, Kyle takes to this role well, developing a close relationships with many of his fellow soldiers. When he goes home, however, we begin to see the cracks in that version of Kyle we met in the first act. War has changed him. It seems, in fact, that he’s more at home at the war. Cooper gets better as the film goes along, playing Kyle right in the increasingly large divide between deadly killer and loving husband.
However, for a while the film forgets that Kyle wife’s Taya, played by Sienna Miller, even exists. It’s just kind of a tempered action war movie. Finally, there’s a scene where Taya and Chris talk on the phone and all hell breaks loose, fusing these two stories together once again. In moments like this one, Eastwood shows the full spectrum of Kyle’s plight. His soldiers need him but so does his family. That conflict becomes what the movie is about for the second half.
american-sniper-2

Many Great Scenes, Little Cohesion

Even when the film isn’t fulfilling the full promise of its potential, Eastwood’s approach makes for compelling drama. A scene back home where Kyle is recognized is drenched in meaning. Every time Kyle goes back to Iraq for another tour – something guilt drives him to do again and again – the action gets more intense and effective as the personnel losses continue to mount. Several scenes involving the birth of his children clearly display that this man is heroic and caring, but also unable to reconcile the horrors he’s lived with a regular life.
There’s also the fact while there are a handful of compelling sniper scenes, mostly at the beginning and end of the film, the majority of American Sniper doesn’t show Kyle as a sniper. He’s a fearless leader on the hunt for some key Al Qaeda assets, but he does this from the ground, not the rooftops. This makes the unique premise set up at the beginning of the film into something a bit more recognizable.
American Sniper Bradley Cooper

The Verdict

American Sniper works, but never works perfectly. There are moments and scenes where the scope of Eastwood’s vision come into focus, but for the most part it is comprised of many good elements that don’t quite fit together. There’s no doubt the film is a worthy tribute to Chris Kyle and represents some of the best work of Bradley Cooper’s career. It’s merely an above-average effort from Eastwood.

American Sniper : Movie Review

Wednesday, February 4, 2015



 I need no introduction to my life with Disney, we all grew up with it, we all have a favorite, least favorite, first one we saw, first one we saw in theaters, everyone who has a love for movies in general first watched a Disney movie
we deny we liked it when we go to High School, then come back to it, there's no word for it, but Disney.
This is my big return to Disney on the cinema, since the last Disney movie I saw in cinemas was "Treasure Planet" (2002) which was 10 years ago. They went through a downturn with "Home on the Range"(2004) (while i found that movie to be funny and entertaining when i was younger, i can side with people who say it is far from being a "good" Disney movie.) Then on Disney movies were average but had loyal fans, and Pixar took over as the Best Animated movies (until 'shudder' Cars 2). Now Disney is making good stuff again starting with their return to 2D in 2009 with "Princess and the Frog" (which I haven't seen, but consider due to the awesome villain.) "Tangled" (2010) I liked a lot, proving how far Disney has come with 3d animation 'without' Pixar. Even more so with "Wreck it Ralph" (2012) which I rented on DVD when it came out, and thought to myself "this would've looked great in 3D". Considering that this movie was done by the same people of those last two films, and the fact that i haven't watched a Disney movie on the big screen in almost ten years, that was more than enough reason for me to check it out
I found it to be an overall good time with great animation and Disney magic, and definitely recommend it to people to check it out for themselves and decide. By no means "Beauty and the Beast" (1991) quality, but that's doubtful Disney will come that far again anyway. as much as I love "Beauty and the Beast", "Aladdin"(1992), and "Lion King" (1994), I'm never try to compare any other Disney movie to those, I accept these are classics, and focus on lesser appreciated ones nowadays like "Hunchback of Notre Dame" (1996), and "Hercules" (1997) (this movie is so clumsy, flawed and flimsy and i love every second of it, particularly the art design and James Woods)
 "Frozen" is inspired by "The Ice Queen" by Hans Christian Anderson much like "The Little Mermaid" (1989), the main character is a redhead, and NOT voiced by Jodi Benson, because Disney knows better how to rip itself off than Don Bluth.
It's written and directed by first timer Jennifer Lee who wrote Wreck it Ralph and Chris Buck who has been involved with most Disney movies and directed "Tarzan" (1999) the very first Disney movie I saw in the cinema. The movie opened with a Mickey Mouse cartoon, which thank god they did, because I arrived late and didn't want to miss it. 
The plot revolves around a young princess named Elsa who has the power to make ice, but because of a childhood accident she caused her sister, Anna, she stays isolated and tries to hide it. Their castle is sealed off, and the sisters grow apart. Years later their parents soon die in a storm (not a spoiler it's a Disney movie). One day they decide to open the gates to have Princess Elsa crowned queen, which excites her sister Anna who wants to meet maybe her true love which she immediately does and proposes on the spot (also not a spoiler, Disney movie, though it is funny to actually hear the words "you can't fall in love with a person in one day" actually said in a Disney movie). Elsa's powers are exposed and she runs away to the North Mountain, inadvertently unleashing eternal winter on the kingdom. Anna goes off an adventure to talk some sense into her with an ice trader Kristoff, his reindeer Sven, and a living snowman Olaf, who sparks a childhood memory in Anna.
Pretty simple, and they surprisingly do a good job, throwing good and twists and turns at you, I legitimately didn't know where it was going, and  there was some good surprises.there's good chases scenes, adventure, and action, and a snow giant with an awesome design. I wont spoil it but there's a reveal with a villain, I will admit, when it was revealed I did NOT see it coming, but it could've been developed a little better, the way it was with Wreck it Ralph, coincidentally with a character who may or may not be the villain, voiced by Alan Tudyk. I didn't expect a great villain, which DIsney is known for, but it could've been handled better. I expected the strength to be the emotional connection, between her sister. It showed promise in the beginning, but I expected a more fleshed out relationship between the two, and that would be the movies' strength, like "Lilo and Stitch"(2002). They throw in a couple aspects that aren't explained as well, but keep it simple enough for me to be invested, and Disney movies have a strength and leaving you wanting more. There are some cheesy jokes that are there for the kids, and some that try to be for older audiences (like Dreamworks) and some backfire but none made me shake my head in disapproval. Some cheesy jokes had a charm to them that made me laugh. There are some small rock creatures that raised Kristoff, who at one point during a musical number to bring the romance of Kristoff and Anna, one of them says he passed a kidney stone, that cheesy joke i have to admit was pretty clever and got a laugh.
The characters are good, Anna is at times a bit forced with her clutszy optimism in the same fashion as Rapunzel, but she's overall as likable, voiced by Kristen Bell of "Veronica Mars", who I'm sure many people would have liked to see as a Disney princess. Elsa, surprisingly doesn't get that much screentime. But I liked Elsa enough, I love her design, she has impressive powers, and is sympathetic. (Now there's Jack Frost and Elsa slash fanfiction taking place of Jack Frost and Rapunzel) Idina Menzel does a good job and surprisingly her adult voice fits fine with the character (unlike Jay Bruchael in How to Train Your Dragon, Chris Pine in Rise of the Guardians, and Ed Helms in Lorax) ironically it's her singing voice that barely fit with the character, inspite of how good her singing voice is. Kristoff is a fun male character and he and Anna play off each other real well, and he also plays off well with the reindeer Sven, who gets a lot of good silent humor, there is a running joke where Kristoff talks for him, it's kinda cheesy, but it's humor for the kids, there is one point where he's debating whether or not to go with Anna and he talks for Sven telling him to go, and that got a laugh. The show stealer created for the kids of course is Olaf the snowman who wishes to experience Summer. At first with the trailers I thought I wouldn't like this character, but I heard good things, particularly that he's voiced by Josh Gad, whose work I'm not familiar with, but I've heard he can be really funny, and was in Broadway's "The Book of Mormon" made by the guys who did "South Park" which you can't go wrong with. The character of Olaf is funny and likable, there are a few corny jokes, but he has his moments, Josh Gad's delivery is mostly what sold it for me, (BTW, people were right he does sound like Jonah Hill). Then there's Alan Tudyk, when the movie started I actually forgot which character he was playing, so I listened to each character and tried to figure out who he voiced. I guessed about 3 characters, and it turns out he was playing the Duke of Weselton. Which is a shame because they didn't give him much to do. There is a funny scene where he hits on Anna and seems pretty energetic, and corrects people on the pronunciation of his town. But there still wasn't much to him, it's not like King Candy in Wreck it Ralph, where in spite of him essentially impersonating the Ed Wynn Mad Hatter (from "The much better Disney movie!") was a lot of fun and entertaining. Alan Tudyk is fun and entertaining as usual with the character and the over the top accent, there's just not much of him. Unlike a lot of animated movies, the voice actors are not distracting, they have familiar faces, but none of them are so distinct that they're distracting. that's why Mandy Moore didn't distract me as Rapunzel (in spite of what other people thought). Kristen Bell's voice definitely matches up good for Anna. and they have Maurice LaMarche as the father (a pro voice actor in a theatrical animated movie, imagine that)
The animation is of course gorgeous. While a few people aren't too big on the big eyed "Tangled" style animation, I personally find it appealing and nice to look at. Unsurprisingly one of my favorite piece of animation is the ice kingdom formed by Elsa, (I wished there was more of it) and the way her powers worked. I saw it in 3D, since animated movies often have a reputation for looking phenomenal, I don't know what phenomenal 3D looks like I haven't seen Avatar or How to Train Your Dragon, so i don't know if it's just those movies, or if my theater doesn't have the same great 3D projection (I have not been to an IMAX theater yet.) But the 3D here worked well, there are times where you feel like you're in a world of snow, which is a good movie to have in 3D, the same with a video game world.
The musical numbers are pretty good, not Disney's best or the most memorable, but given time I'm sure they'll grow on me; I don't remember many songs the first time i hear them anyway. Some are used to further the story like a musical should, though at times they do feel out of place, some cheesy lines, and not all are needed. But the songs are good enough, I did not know it was Kristen Bell singing the first time i saw this, and i have to say she's not too bad, Josh Gad with his Olaf introduction song sounds good, he was on Broadway, after all. Jonathan Groff and Idina Menzel, of course have great voices. 
While Menzel's voice for the famous "Let it Go" song, surprisingly I preferred the Demi Lovato version. It could be because I'm more used to it, but i thought her rendition was great. Demi Lovato, who I'm not an enormous fan of, nor do i hate her (that would be reserved for the Jonas Brothers her costars, ugh), but i give credit where credit is due, she belts it out and gave the song great compassion, and it sounds fantastic, i stayed at most of the end credits just to hear it
So overall, the more i think about it, I did really like the movie, it is worthy of being from Disney. any problems i did have with it, was clouded by something interesting, I wanted to know what happened next and was invested, especially by the time we got to the adventure part. The characters are good, the animation is great as usual, i definitely say, if you're a fan of Disney (which I'm sure you are) check it out and decide for yourself.

Frozen Review

 
Review Pirates © 2015 - Designed by